Marion Müller
©WSW
Opinion
Marion MüllerNo. 1/2026

Mind the gap

An appeal for greater courage in aca­de­mic ap­point­ments by Marion Müller

World-class re­se­ar­chers stand for ex­cel­lence and com­pe­ti­ti­ve strength. In order to attract as many of them to Germany as pos­si­ble, uni­ver­si­ties need to ensure in­ter­na­tio­nal ap­point­ments are in­te­gra­ted into their or­ga­ni­za­tio­nal struc­tures. This is the only way for them to stop being an ex­cep­ti­on and start being the norm. An appeal by Marion Müller, a member of the Ma­nage­ment Board of Wübben Stif­tung Wis­sen­schaft.

Terms like in­ter­na­tio­na­li­za­ti­on and cos­mo­po­li­ta­nism are stan­dard in German uni­ver­si­ty stra­te­gies. And ta­g­li­nes like “Ex­cel­lence through di­ver­si­ty” and even “Global minds” are not un­com­mon. There is a great deal of in­te­rest in global ex­cel­lence, but when it comes to in­ter­na­tio­nal ap­point­ments, we find a paradox: Despite being de­si­ra­ble both po­li­ti­cal­ly and stra­te­gi­cal­ly, in­ter­na­tio­nal ap­point­ments are still the ex­cep­ti­on. In 2023, for­eig­ners ac­coun­ted for just 10.7 percent of pro­fes­sors at German uni­ver­si­ties, and this sta­tis­tic does not dif­fe­ren­tia­te between pro­fes­sors who were re­crui­ted from abroad through in­ter­na­tio­nal efforts and foreign ci­ti­zens who were already re­si­dent in Germany at the time of their ap­point­ment. If we look at all higher edu­ca­ti­on in­sti­tu­ti­ons, in­clu­ding those spe­cia­li­zing in applied sci­en­ces, art, and music, the pro­por­ti­on of in­ter­na­tio­nal pro­fes­sors was ac­tual­ly lower, at 8 percent.

There is a gap between aspi­ra­ti­on and reality that could weaken Ger­many's po­si­ti­on as a center of science in the long term.

This means there is a gap between aspi­ra­ti­on and reality that could weaken Germany as a global hub for re­se­arch and scho­l­ar­ship in the long term. Despite all the clear de­cla­ra­ti­ons about the im­por­t­an­ce of in­ter­na­tio­nal talent, when making pro­fes­so­ri­al ap­point­ments, we find our­sel­ves na­vi­ga­ting struc­tu­ral ten­si­ons: We strive for ex­cel­lence, but insist on “in­her­ent­ly equal pro­ces­ses” and “cul­tu­ral fit”. We want in­ter­na­tio­nal di­ver­si­ty, but our ap­point­ment com­mit­tees are often ho­mo­ge­ne­ous. We strive to recruit “the very best”, but often think we know in advance who the best can­di­da­tes are. We want fair app­raisals, but often choose expert as­ses­sors who will not ques­ti­on our selec­tion. We want a culture of welcome, but still have a long way to go before in­ter­na­tio­nal talents find it easy to settle into their new roles and lives. We want quick ap­point­ments, but our pro­ce­du­res are often pro­trac­ted by in­ter­na­tio­nal stan­dards. All of these aspects put in­ter­na­tio­nal can­di­da­tes at a dis­ad­van­ta­ge.

The con­se­quen­ces for Germany could be more far-reaching than we would like. In view of the in­ten­si­fy­ing global com­pe­ti­ti­on for highly skilled workers, mobile talent can pick and choose the most at­trac­tive de­sti­na­ti­on coun­tries. A 2023 OECD study on “In­di­ca­tors of Talent At­trac­tiveness”  reveals that the most suc­cess­ful coun­tries are those that ac­tively try to attract highly skilled workers and offer them un­bea­ta­ble all-round pa­cka­ges. The chances of highly qua­li­fied foreign aca­de­mics finding jobs that match their skills pro­files are not as good in Germany as in other suc­cess­ful OECD coun­tries. If Germany wants to be one of the winners in this field, it needs to ap­proach in­ter­na­tio­nal ap­point­ments sys­te­ma­ti­cal­ly and stra­te­gi­cal­ly. It is im­portant to have clear targets for in­ter­na­tio­nal re­cruit­ment, in­ter­na­tio­nal­ly com­pa­ti­ble ap­point­ment pro­ce­du­res, and pro­fes­sio­nal support struc­tures.

Better op­por­tu­nities for in­ter­na­tio­nal re­se­ar­chers needed

In­ter­na­tio­nal aca­de­mics need better op­por­tu­nities to launch a career in Germany. This means taking their needs into account in pro­ce­du­res and pro­ces­ses, from writing the job advert to signing the con­tract – but also af­ter­wards, when the new re­cruits arrive, settle in, and start their re­se­arch. When Ella Ex­cel­lent arrives in Bamberg from Boston, she must be just as well placed to begin her work as Boris Bril­li­ant when he arrives from Bonn – despite the dif­fe­rence in aca­de­mic systems. This can be tricky in prac­tice, but there are count­less examp­les of suc­cess­ful in­ter­na­tio­nal ap­point­ments at German uni­ver­si­ties that de­mons­tra­te how it can be done.

Uni­ver­si­ties must create the or­ga­ni­za­tio­nal, struc­tu­ral, and cul­tu­ral con­di­ti­ons ne­cessa­ry for world-class in­ter­na­tio­nal ap­point­ments to become the rule and enable them to unleash their full impact.

Marion Müller

To achieve all this, we need an honest debate about in­ter­na­tio­nal ap­point­ments, and the courage to make changes. In­ter­na­tio­nal ex­cel­lence re­qui­res in­sti­tu­tio­nal wil­ling­ness. Uni­ver­si­ties must create the or­ga­ni­za­tio­nal, struc­tu­ral, and cul­tu­ral con­di­ti­ons ne­cessa­ry for world-class in­ter­na­tio­nal ap­point­ments to become the rule and enable them to unleash their full impact. We need trans­pa­rent pro­ce­du­res and pro­ces­ses, mul­ti­lin­gu­al ad­mi­nis­tra­ti­ve struc­tures, and fle­xi­ble career paths. But we also need an at­ti­tu­de that sees an in­ter­na­tio­nal profile not as a label, but as a re­sour­ce, and a culture of welcome that enables scho­l­ars from abroad to ge­nui­ne­ly take part in German life, and not just within the aca­de­mic sphere. Only then will German uni­ver­si­ties be able to live up to their claim of being in­ter­na­tio­nal­ly open and glo­bal­ly com­pe­ti­ti­ve. Let’s work tog­e­ther to close the gap!

Marion Müller is a member of the Ma­nage­ment Board of Wübben Stif­tung Wis­sen­schaft. Pre­vious­ly, she worked for 12 years as Ma­na­ging Di­rec­tor of the Ein­stein Foun­da­ti­on Berlin. From 2006 to 2010, she headed the North America office of the German Re­se­arch Foun­da­ti­on (DFG).